The case talked about in PLJ 1997 SC 985 involved a declaration that respondents, staying co-sharers, were being proprietors from the land. The match was originally dismissed, but on charm, it was decreed in favor of your respondents. It could, but only for a while. Would there be any issue https://reidmeyvd.blog2freedom.com/31157393/the-5-second-trick-for-title-and-ownership-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me